- Posted
- Feb 16th 2005
Not exactly into SA's politics, but, I suppose just some info?
Apparently, Grave (ze mod) left SA a few days ago all pissed off and feeling betrayed (at least his last post seemed pissed off) because the other admins removed his administrative position and deleted his 'suggestive' animal-people drawings without discussing with him. .___.
(they weren't all that adult, really ._. .. although still, they are mature enough to get nailed should the admins chose to. =3= Don't see them doing anything to beautiful suggestive pics such as
this 
)
Don't know what to make of the situation. Such drama and plot twists... would've been entertaining if it's fictional
(...will pretend it never happened and move on, @w@)
goldenmane Says:
That's one reaon why I had so many questions for them is how far will they considered implied since it could be something as simple as cuddling or a kiss. I still don't trust the mods not to start deleting work they find 'questionable', even if it's not questionable at all, just for reasons of spite >shakes her head sadly<
Jet Says:
This also makes me wonder what's considered tame and acceptable compared to tasteless and pornography, because the line seems to get obscured after a while, and anything showing too much skin too near to another person seems to get regarded as smut.
Sure, it shouldn't have a profound effect, but I do plan to post some more intimate drawings of my characters perhaps holding each other in the nudity of a fur coat. Thing is, policy might not see it that way and I don't wanna get in trouble.
Er, I'm done.
Trinity630 Says:
I agree. They should've talked to him first.
Rhythm Wily Says:
They need to clear-cuttingly define "Suggestive." I'm serious...Cause this is a line that can be really blurry.